Technical fit
Manufacturing process, material and further requirements are checked against actual supplier history.
Supplier Matching · New drawing part
The drawing defines the need. Your history proves who can deliver.
Velanis checks technical requirements against demonstrated capabilities in your supplier base – creating an evidence-backed top three with technical context.
What you get
A shortlist with a clear explanation.
The result shows who fits, why they fit and which assumptions need expert review.
Visible evidence
Proof, exclusions and data gaps remain transparent for procurement.
Decision context
Should-cost and CO₂ indications complement supplier selection in the same workspace.
One new sourcing decision
From PDF to a defensible first selection.
Understand the drawing
Technical characteristics are structured and exposed for review.
Check capabilities
Requirements are matched against company-specific supplier profiles.
Decide on the top three
Procurement receives candidates, explanations and clear exclusions.
Procurement owns the final award
Velanis makes selection faster and more transparent. Expert approval and the final sourcing decision remain with procurement.
Your supplier base
Where does your supplier base need attention?
A shared view of spend, part portfolio and delivery performance, with data coverage, capabilities and open review points where the data supports them.
Illustrative example explaining purchasing volume and data coverage.
Supplier A · high spend
A relevant share of purchasing volume in the selected period.
Technical coverage · incomplete
Structured characteristics are missing for some purchased items.
Next review
Prioritise the linked parts and complete their technical data.
From supplier base to action
Understand the data. Review the result. Continue working.
What you need to start
ERP file import with supplier and part IDs, order date, quantity, price and currency. Delivery performance also requires agreed and actual delivery dates. You can start without drawings.
What limits the conclusion
High spend does not prove risk and an anomaly does not promise savings. Missing delivery dates limit performance assessment; technical capabilities require linked part profiles.
Continue in the platform
Move from the supplier to the affected parts. Close specific data gaps and review the finding with the responsible buyer.
30 minutes · Live in the product
Let’s talk about your procurement. Productivity. Now.
We show how drawings, ERP history and your supplier base become a defensible decision. Bring your questions and see how your procurement can become more productive.
Request a demo →No obligation · personal · built around your use case